Tạp chí Công Thương - Các kết quả nghiên cứu

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
Tài chính - Ngân hàng - Bảo hiểm Issue:

The impact of tax costs on firm value: Empirical evidence from Vietnam

Lê Thị Phương Hà: VietinBank Chi nhánh 2 Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh; Lê Ngọc Thanh: Agribank Chi nhánh Đông Gia Lai; Dương Thị Thùy An: Trường Đại học Ngân hàng Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh;
doi:10.62831/nckh.2026.176.v1

Abstract

This study examines the impact of tax costs on firm value in Vietnam using a sample of 814 listed non-financial companies over the 2016–2024 period, comprising 6,512 firm-year observations. Employing a correlated random effects model combined with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors, the results reveal that tax costs have a positive and statistically significant effect on firm value. Further industry-specific analysis indicates that this effect is heterogeneous across sectors. In particular, the pharmaceutical, healthcare, and telecommunications sectors exhibit a significantly negative effect, whereas the consumer services sector shows a distinctly positive effect; the remaining sectors do not differ significantly from the baseline. These findings suggest that the relationship between tax costs and firm value depends on industry characteristics and the way in which the market interprets tax-related information.

Keywords
tax costs effective tax rate enterprise value corporate finance

References

1.
Abdul Wahab N. S., Holland K. (2012). Tax planning, corporate governance and equity value. British Accounting Review, 44(2), 111-124.
2.
Alvarez & Marsal (2012). Global CFO survey: Tax as a key business issue. Alvarez & Marsal Holdings, LLC.
3.
Assidi S., Aliani K., & Omri M. A. (2016). Tax optimization and the firm value: Evidence from the Tunisian context. Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(3), 177-184.
4.
Bryant-Kutcher L., Guenther D. A., & Jackson M. P. (2012). How do cross-country differences in corporate tax rates affect firm value?. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 709-745.
5.
Chen S., Chen X., Cheng Q., & Shevlin T. (2014). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 114(1), 41-61.
6.
Desai M. A., & Dharmapala D. (2009). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537-546.
7.
Fama E. F., & French, K. R. (1998). Taxes, financing decisions, and firm value. Journal of Finance, 53(3), 819-843.
8.
Foley C. F., Hartzell J. C., Titman S., & Twite G. (2007). Why do firms hold so much cash? A tax-based explanation. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(3), 579-607.
9.
Hanlon M., & Heitzman S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178.
10.
Jensen M. C., & Meckling W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
11.
Le V. H., Anh T., Vu T., & Nguyen M. H. (2022). Tax planning and firm value: The case of companies with different state ownership in Vietnam. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.9i2.700
12.
Ohlson J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687.
13.
Spence M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
14.
Tobin J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29.
15.
Vu T. H., & Le T. P. H. (2021). Tax avoidance and firm value: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 123-131.
16.
Watts R. L., & Zimmerman J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-134.
17.
Zimmerman J. L. (1983). Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5(2), 119-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90008-3.

Files

Lượt xem3104
Trích dẫn9
Section Tài chính - Ngân hàng - Bảo hiểm
Banner quảng cáo