Tạp chí Công Thương - Các kết quả nghiên cứu

Article detail

Article detail description

Home
Kinh doanh Issue:

Fake online reviews and their impact on e-commerce activities

Published: January 24, 2025
doi:10.62831/202502018

Abstract

Consulting online reviews before shopping on e-commerce platforms has become an essential activity for consumers on the Internet due to its usefulness. Recognizing the importance of online reviews, many individuals and organizations have engaged in fake reviews that misrepresent products and services. As a result, consumers are gradually losing trust in online reviews or have to invest more time analyzing these reviews. Based on collected articles and reports, this study systematized and clarified the concepts, current status, and impacts of fake online reviews on e-commerce activities. The study also proposes several recommendations for online users on how to recognize and detect fake reviews to protect themselves during their shopping experiences on e-commerce platforms.

References

1.
Abu Hammad et al., (2013), An Approach for Detecting Spam in Arabic Opinion Reviews, Doctoral Dissertation, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine.
2.
Akerlof & George A., (1970), The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, Q. J. Econ. 84 (3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431. August 1970.
DOI: doi.org/10.2307/1879431
3.
Algur et al., (2010), Conceptual level similarity measure based review spam detection, International Conference on Signal and Image Processing. IEEE, 416-423.
DOI: doi.org/10.1109/ICSIP.2010.5697509
4.
Cardoso et al., (2018), Towards automatic filtering of fake reviews, Neurocomputing 309, 106–116.
DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.04.074
5.
Crawford et al., (2015), Survey of review spam detection using machine learning techniques, Journal of Big Data 2
DOI: doi.org/10.1186/s40537-015-0029-9
6.
DePaulo et al., (1996), Lying in everyday life. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70 (5), 979, 1996.
DOI: doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.979
7.
Floridi et al., (2020), GPT-3: its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds Mach.
DOI: doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3827044
8.
Filieri & Raffaele, (2016). What makes an online consumer review trustworthy? Ann. Tourism Res, 46-64.
DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.12.019
9.
Gobi, N., Rathinavelu, A., (2019), Analyzing cloud based reviews for product ranking using feature based clustering algorithm, Cluster Comput. 22 (3), 6977–6984.
DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-1996-3
10.
He et al., (2021), The Market for Fake Reviews, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
11.
Ismagilova et al., (2020), The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: a meta- analysis, J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 53
DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.005
12.
Jindal et al., (2008), Opinion spam and analysis, International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 219-230.
DOI: doi.org/10.1145/1341531.1341560
13.
Lee et al., (2016), Capturing word choice patterns with LDA for fake review detection in sentiment analysis. International Conference on Web Intelligence, NY, USA.
DOI: doi.org/10.1145/2912845.2912868
14.
Luca & Michael, (2011), Reviews, reputation, and revenue: the case of Yelp.Com, SSRN Journal.
DOI: doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1928601
15.
M. Anderson and A. Smith, (2016), Online Shopping and ECommerce, Pew Research Center.
16.
Mukherjee et al., (2013), What yelp fake review filter might be doing?, International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
17.
Munzel et al., (2014), Creators, multipliers, and lurkers: who contributes and who benefits at online review sites, Journal of Service Management.
DOI: doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2307117
18.
Ott et al., (2011), Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination, arXiv preprint arXiv:1107.4557.
19.
P. Hajek et al., (2020), Fake consumer review detection using deep neural networks integrating word embeddings and emotion mining, Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 32, no. 23, pp. 17259–17274.
DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04757-2
20.
Plotkina et al., (2020), Illusions of truth—experimental insights into human and algorithmic detections of fake online reviews, J. Bus. Res. 109 (March 2020), 511–523.
DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.009
21.
Sun et al., (2013), Synthetic review spamming and defense, International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, 9. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
22.
Shivagangadhar et al.,( 2015). Fraud detection in online reviews using machine learning techniques. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. 5 (5), 52-56.
23.
Reviewmeta.com, “Amazon Flooded with Millions of Fake Reviews in 2019,” Reviewmeta.com. 2019. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://reviewmeta.com/blog/amazonflooded-with-millions-of-fake-reviews-in-2019/

Files

PDF
Lượt xem3104
Trích dẫn9
Section Kinh doanh
Issue Industry and Trade Magazine - Scientific research results and technology applications No 2(1/2025)

Related articles section label

Related articles

Related articles category hint

More articles

Tác động của rủi ro cảm nhận đến ý định mua hàng trên TikTok Shop của người tiêu dùng thế hệ Gen Z tại TP. Hồ Chí Minh

Nghiên cứu này xem xét tác động của rủi ro cảm nhận đến ý định mua hàng của người tiêu dùng thế hệ Z trên TikTok Shop tại TP. Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Nam. Phương pháp nghiên cứu định lượng được sử dụng với dữ liệu được thu thậ...

Chi tiết bài báo
File
DOI: 10.62831/nckh.2026.193.v1
Nguyen Xuan Thinh; Ton Bich Tuong
Banner quảng cáo