Determinants of sustainable textile and garment exports to the European Union: Evidence from a PLS-SEM analysis
Published: August 3, 2026
Abstract
This study investigates the determinants of sustainable textile and garment exports to the European Union using a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach. The findings indicate that socio-environmental regulations, commitments to sustainable development, technological innovation, competitiveness, and human capital exert significant positive effects on sustainable export performance. In contrast, rules-of-origin requirements remain a substantial barrier. The results further highlight the supportive roles of mass media and corporate humanistic culture in enhancing awareness and fostering pro-sustainability practices within the industry. Overall, the study provides a robust analytical framework for understanding the drivers of sustainable exports in Vietnam’s textile and garment sector.
Keywords
sustainable exportsVietnamese textiles and garmentsthe European UnionPLS-SEMnew generation FTAs.
References
1.
Tài liệu tiếng Việt:
2.
Đặng Thị Phương Hoa (2022). Hai năm thực hiện Hiệp định EVFTA: Tác động kinh tế - xã hội và những vấn đề đặt ra đối với Việt Nam. Kỷ yếu hội thảo khoa học, Viện Nghiên cứu châu Âu, Hà Nội.
3.
Đỗ Thị Bình & Trần Văn Trang (2021). Ảnh hưởng của áp lực thể chế đến chiến lược xuất khẩu thân thiện môi trường, hợp tác trong chuỗi cung ứng và lợi thế cạnh tranh tại các doanh nghiệp dệt may. Tạp chí Kinh tế & Phát triển, (288), 33-42.
4.
Hồ Trung Thanh (2009). Xuất khẩu bền vững ở Việt Nam trong quá trình hội nhập kinh tế quốc tế. Luận án tiến sĩ, Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội.
5.
ILO (2019). Báo cáo tổng hợp về tuân thủ trong ngành may mặc giai đoạn 2017-2018. Truy cập tại https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-hanoi/documents/publication/wcms_574711.pdf.
6.
VBCSD (2022). Bộ chỉ số Doanh nghiệp bền vững (CSI). Truy cập tại https://vbcsd.vn/csi/default.aspx.
7.
Vũ Kim Dung (2021). Tận dụng cơ chế ưu đãi từ các hiệp định thương mại tự do của Việt Nam. Luận án Tiến sĩ, Đại học Ngoại thương.
8.
Vương Thị Thanh Trì (2021). Các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến thực hiện trách nhiệm xã hội của các doanh nghiệp thuộc tập đoàn dệt may Việt Nam. Luận án Tiến sĩ, Trường Đại học Kinh tế Quốc dân.
9.
Tài liệu tiếng nước ngoài:
10.
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197-218.
11.
Baumgartner, R.J. (2009). Organizational culture and leadership: Preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation. Sustainable Development, 17(2), 102-113.
12.
Beder, S. (1994). The role of technology in sustainable development. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 13(4), 14-19.
13.
Biselli, M. (2009). China’s role in the global textile industry, Student Research Projects/Outputs No.039. China Europe International Business School.
14.
Bonilla, S.H., Silva, H.R., Terra da Silva, M., Franco Gonçalves, R. & Sacomano, J.B. (2018). Industry 4.0 and sustainability implications: A scenario-based analysis of the impacts and challenge. Sustainability, 10(10), 3740.
15.
Brenton, P. & Manchin, M. (2003). Making EU trade agreements work: The role of rules of origin. The World Economy, 26(5), 755-769.
Camisón, C. & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902.
18.
Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Crippa, L. & Moretto, A. (2012). Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: An exploratory case based research. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 659-670.
19.
Cooke, R.A. & Rousseau, D.M. (1988). Behavioral norms and expectations: A quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group & Organization Studies, 13(3), 245-273.
20.
Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265-273.
21.
DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
22.
Duanmu, J.L., Bu, M. & Pittman, R. (2018). Does market competition dampen environmental performance? Evidence from China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(11), 3006-3030.
23.
Fedulova, I., Voronkova, O.Y., Zhuravleva, P., Gerasimova, L., Glyzina, M. & Alekhina, N.A. (2019). Labor productivity and its role in the sustainable development of economy: On the example of a region. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), 1059.
24.
Galbreath, J. (2010). Drivers of corporate social responsibility: The role of formal strategic planning and firm culture. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 511-525.
25.
Gardas, B.B, Raut, R.D. & Narkhede, B. (2018). Modelling the challenges to sustainability in the textile and apparel (T&A) sector: A Delphi-DEMATEL approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 96-108.
26.
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
27.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
28.
Hush, E. (2018). Where no man has gone before: The future of sustainable development in the comprehensive economic and trade agreement and next-generation free trade agreements. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 43(1), 93-180.
29.
Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 834-864.
30.
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal.
31.
Kotter, J.P. (2008). Corporate culture and performance. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
32.
Mia, L. & Clarke, B. (1999). Market competition, management accounting systems and business unit performance. Management Accounting Research, 10(2), 137-158.
33.
Nianli, Z. (2008). Sustainable development of export: Theoretical meaning, evaluation model, and empirical research. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 6(4), 20-27.
34.
Niinimaki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T. & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(4), 189-200.
35.
OECD (2009). Innovation in Firms: A Microeconomic Perspective. Available at https:// www.oecd.org/berlin/44120491.pdf
36.
Pelinescu, E. (2015). The impact of human capital on economic growth. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, 184-190.
37.
Robins, N. & Roberts, S. (2000). The reality of sustainable trade. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.
38.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Homburg et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research. Springer.
39.
Sharma, A. & Narula, S.A. (2020). What motivates and inhibits Indian textile firms to embrace sustainability?. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1-23.
40.
Slaus, I. & Jacobs, G. (2011). Human capital and sustainability. Sustainability, 3(1), 97-154.
41.
Sousa, C. M. P. (2004). Export performance measurement: An evaluation of the empirical research in the literature. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2004(9), 1-22.
42.
Staritz, C., Plank, L. & Morris, M. (2016). Global value chains, industrial policy, and sustainable development - Ethiopia’s apparel export sector. Proceedings of International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Geneva.
43.
Subramaniam, M. & Youndt, M.A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
44.
Takahashi, K. & Urata, S. (2010). On the use of FTAs by Japanese firms: Further evidence. Business and Politics, 12(1), 1-15.
45.
Trivedi, R.H., Patel, J.D. & Acharya, N. (2018). Causality analysis of media influence on environmental attitude, intention and behaviors leading to green purchasing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 11-22.
46.
UNEP (2020). Sustainability and Circularity in the Textile Value Chain. Global Stocktaking, Kenya.
47.
Unger, J.M., Rauch, A., Frese, M. & Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta‐analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 341-358.
48.
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
49.
Wall, T. D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S. J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C. W., & West, M. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 95-118.
50.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
51.
Wignaraja, G. (2014). The determinants of FTA use in Southeast Asia: A firm‐level analysis. Journal of Asian Economics, 35, 32-45.
52.
Wood, E.M. (1991). The pristine culture of capitalism: A historical essay on old regimes and modern states. London, UK: Verso.
53.
Wu, G.C., Ding, J.H. & Chen, P.S. (2012). The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 618-636.
54.
Zhang, Y. (2010). The impact of free trade agreements on business activity: A survey of firms in the People’s Republic of China (ADBI Working Paper Series No. 251). Tokyo, Japan: Asian Development Bank Institute.
55.
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. & Lai, K.H. (2007). Initiatives and outcomes of green supply chain management implementation by Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(1), 179-189.
56.
Zou, S., Taylor, C. R., & Osland, G. E. (1998). The EXPERF scale: A cross-national generalized export performance measure. Journal of International Marketing, 6(3), 37-58.
