Issue: Số 4 - Tháng 3 - 2024Tài chính - Ngân hàng - Bảo hiểm
FACTORS AFFECTING THE TOBIN'S Q MARKET VALUE OF REAL ESTATE COMPANIES LISTED ON THE HO CHI MINH CITY STOCK EXCHANGE
Published: July 28, 2026
Abstract
This study deeply analyzed eight main factors affecting the Tobin's Q market value of real estate businesses, including: debt ratio, business scale, asset turnover, solvency, asset ratio fixed income, growth opportunities, economic growth, and corporate income tax. In particular, these main factors are divided into two groups affecting Tobin's Q market value, including the group of observations that have a positive impact (5 factors) and the group of observations that have a negative impact (3 factors). The study also provided recommendations for business managers and state management agencies in the real estate sector to make policies that support real estate businesses to increase their market values.
Keywords
market valuereal estate businessesHo Chi Minh City Stock Exchange
References
1.
Bozec, R., Dia, M., & Bozec, Y. (2010). Governance performance relationship: A Re-examination Using Technical Efficiency Measures. British Journal of Management, 21, 684-700.
2.
Hansen L. P. (1982). Large Sample Properties of Generalized Methods of Moments Estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029-1054.
3.
Hausman, J.A. (1978). Specification test in econometrics. Econometria, 46(6), 1252-1271.
4.
Khan, M. W. (2012). The relationship between capital structure decisions and firm performance: Evidence from the engineering sector in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2(5), 67-83.
5.
L. W. Mwangi, Muathe S. Makau, G. Kosimbei (2014). Relationship between Capital Structure and Performance of NonFinancial Companies Listed In the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. Global Journal of Contemporary Research in Accounting, Auditing and Business Ethics, 1(2), 72-90.
6.
Ganguli, S. K., & Agrawal, S. (2009). Ownership structure and firm performance: An empirical study on listed mid-cap Indian companies. The IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 15(12), 37-52.
7.
Shan, Y. G., & Melver, R. P. (2011). Corporate governance mechanisms and financial performance in China: Panel data evidence on listed non-financial companies. Asia Pacific Business Review, 17(3), 301-324.
8.
Sánchez-ballesta, J. P., & García-meca, E. (2007). A meta-analytic vision of the effect of ownership structure on firm performance. Corporate Governance, 15(5), 879-894.
9.
Kapopoulos, P., & Lazaretou, S. (2007). Corporate ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Greek firms. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 144-159.
10.
Nuryanah, S., & Islam, S. M. N. (2011). Corporate governance and performance: Evidence from an emerging market. Malaysian Accounting Review, 10(1), 17-42.
11.
Schultz, E.L., D.T. Tan, and K.D. Walsh (2010). Endogeneity and the corporate governanceperformance relation. Australian Journal of Management, 35(2), 145-163.
12.
Wahlav, K. U. R., Shah, S. Z. A., & Hussain, Z. (2012). Impact of ownership structure on firm performance evidence from non-financial listed companies at Karachi stock exchange. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, (84), 6-13.
