Credit - deposit growth gap and interbank funding adjustment in Vietnam

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the Credit - Deposit Growth Gap (CDG) and adjustments in dependence on interbank funding among 20 listed commercial banks in Vietnam during the 2015 - 2025 period. Using 220 bank-year observations, the study applies a two-way fixed-effects model with bank-clustered standard errors. The findings show that CDG is positively and statistically significantly associated with changes in the ratio of interbank liabilities to total assets. This relationship remains robust across alternative specifications and exhibits signs of asymmetry, being more pronounced during periods when deposit growth exceeds credit growth. The results suggest that CDG can complement conventional indicators used in asset - liability management and funding-risk surveillance.
Keywords
commercial banks credit growth deposit growth interbank funding funding management

References

1.
Ngân hàng Nhà nước Việt Nam (2026). Thông tư số 25/2026/TT-NHNN ngày 22/6/2026 sửa đổi, bổ sung một số điều của Thông tư số 22/2019/TT-NHNN.
2.
VietFina (2026). Dữ liệu báo cáo tài chính lịch sử của các ngân hàng thương mại Việt Nam. https://vietfina.com/.
3.
Allen, F. & Santomero, A. M. (1997). The theory of financial intermediation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(11-12), 1461-1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00032-0.
4.
Berger, A. N. & Bouwman, C. H. S. (2009). Bank liquidity creation. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3779-3837. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn104.
5.
Cornett, M. M., McNutt, J. J., Strahan, P. E. & Tehranian, H. (2011). Liquidity risk management and credit supply in the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.001.
6.
Diamond, D. W. & Dybvig, P. H. (1983). Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 401-419.
7.
Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393-414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297430.
8.
Kladakis, G., Chen, L. & Bellos, S. K. (2022). Wholesale funding and liquidity creation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 59, 1501-1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-022-01081-9.
9.
Le Hoang Vinh, Le Thi Thanh Huong (2026). Bank size and financial intermediation operations in Vietnam: A focus on the deposit-loan nexus in the banking sector. Journal of Finance - Marketing Research, 4(4ene), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.52932/jfmr.v4i4ene.1199.
10.
Nguyen Thi Hai Yen & Nguyen Thanh Liem (2022). Funding liquidity, bank capital, and lending growth in a developing country. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2122958. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2122958.
11.
Nguyen Thi Huong & Dang Thi Hai Yen (2024). Determinants of liquidity risk in Vietnamese commercial banks. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(1), 2076-2084. https://doi.org/10.31817/vjas.2024.7.1.06.
12.
Nguyen Tri Minh, Tran Ngoc Tho, Nguyen Huu Tuan (2022). Liquidity risk, macroprudential regulation and bank performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnamese commercial banks. Journal of International Economics and Management, 22(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.38203/jiem.022.2.0045.
13.
Pham Thi Anh Thu, Nguyen Hong Van (2025). Determinants of liquidity of commercial banks in Vietnam. Journal of Development and Integration, 80, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.61602/jdi.2025.80.01.
14.
Tran Thi Thanh Tu, Nguyen Thi Yen, Nguyen Thi Hong Thuy, Tran Long (2019). The determinants of liquidity risk of commercial banks in Vietnam. Banks and Bank Systems, 14(1), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(1).2019.09.