Tạp chí Công Thương - Các kết quả nghiên cứu

Chi tiết bài viết

Mô tả chi tiết bài viết

Trang chủ
Quản trị - Quản lý Số phát hành:

Internal capabilities and innovation activities in trade and service enterprises: A theoretical review and proposed research model for the eastern area of Dong Thap province

Tran Phan Doan Khanh: Tien Giang University; Nguyen Le Thuy Lien: Tien Giang University;
doi:10.62831/nckh.2026.131.v1

Tóm tắt

In the context of intensifying competition and rapid digital transformation, innovation has become essential to enterprise competitiveness and performance. However, trade and service enterprises in emerging economies, particularly in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta region, continue to face constraints in resources, managerial capacity, and institutional support. Using a theoretical review approach, this study develops a conceptual framework to examine the determinants of innovation activities among trade and service enterprises in the eastern area of Dong Thap Province. The model integrates the Resource-Based View, Market Orientation Theory, Innovation Theory, and Institutional Theory. The findings from the literature indicate that innovation is influenced by both internal capabilities and external environmental factors, including organizational learning, leadership capability, corporate strategy, customer orientation, competitive intensity, competitor orientation, and government support.

Từ khóa
innovation activities internal capabilities organizational learning trade and service enterprises

Tài liệu tham khảo

1.
Acquaah, M. (2013). Management control systems, business strategy and performance: A comparative analysis of family and non-family businesses in a transition economy in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(2), 131–146.
2.
Anwar, M., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation and generic competitive strategies for emerging SMEs: Financial and nonfinancial performance perspective. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(1), e2125.
3.
Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1652–1661.
4.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
5.
Boso, N., Story, V. M., & Cadogan, J. W. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, network ties, and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6), 708–727.
6.
Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
DOI: doi.org/10.1016/s0019-8501(01)00203-6
7.
Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891–2902.
8.
Clauss, T. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: Conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management, 47(3), 385–403.
9.
Crespi, G., & Zuniga, P. (2012). Innovation and productivity: Evidence from six Latin American countries. World Development, 40(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010
DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010
10.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.
11.
Falahat, M., Ramayah, T., Soto-Acosta, P., & Lee, Y. Y. (2020). SMEs internationalization: The role of product innovation, market intelligence, pricing and marketing communication capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 121, 536–547.
12.
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54.
13.
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
DOI: doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
14.
Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2019). Determinants of innovation capability: The roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(3), 527–547.
15.
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400403
DOI: doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400403
16.
Ngo, L. V., & O’Cass, A. (2012). In search of innovation and customer-related performance superiority. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(8), 1256–1263.
17.
Nguyen, T. T., Pham, T. T. H., & Bryant, S. E. (2020). Innovation and SME performance in Vietnam: The role of government support. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 25(2), 77–97.
18.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
19.
OECD. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing.
20.
OECD. (2021). The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. OECD Publishing.
21.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
22.
Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2013). Entrepreneurial propensity of innovation systems: Theory, methodology and evidence. Research Policy, 42(5), 1015–1038.
23.
Real, J. C., Roldán, J. L., & Leal, A. (2014). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(5), 1450033.
24.
Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457.
25.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
26.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
27.
Tajeddini, K. (2015). Exploring the antecedents of effectiveness and efficiency. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 45–55. [thiếu DOI]
28.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097
DOI: doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097
29.
Tran, T. B., Nguyen, T. H., & Vo, D. H. (2021). Innovation and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 847–857.
30.
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.
31.
Zhou, K. Z., Brown, J. R., & Dev, C. S. (2009). Market orientation, competitive advantage, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1063–1070.
32.
Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42–60.
33.
Zhu, Y., Wittmann, X., & Peng, M. W. (2012). Institution-based barriers to innovation in SMEs in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 1131–1142.

Tệp

File
Lượt xem3104
Trích dẫn9
Chuyên mục Quản trị - Quản lý
Số phát hành Số 14 - Tháng 5 - 2026

Cùng chuyên mục

Bài viết liên quan

Các bài trong chuyên đề «Quản trị - Quản lý».

Xem thêm bài viết
Banner quảng cáo