Factors influencing artificial intelligence use behavior in green marketing among Vietnamese tourism and hospitality firms

Abstract

This study examines the factors influencing artificial intelligence (AI) use behavior in green marketing among marketers working in Vietnamese tourism and hospitality firms. Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Technology -Organization - Environment (TOE) framework, and Value – Belief - Norm (VBN) theory, the study analyzes data from 380 valid questionnaires using covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) with robust maximum likelihood estimation, 5,000 bootstrap resamples, and interaction regression based on factor scores. The results show that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, environmental concern, and top management support positively influence attitude. Attitude, subjective norms, and top management support positively affect behavioral intention, which in turn has a positive effect on actual AI use behavior (β = 0.542; p < 0.001). Organizational green commitment positively moderates the intention–behavior relationship, although the interaction effect is small (β = 0.081; p = 0.041). The findings provide additional evidence on the mechanisms through which technological perceptions, environmental values, and organizational conditions are translated into actual AI use in green marketing.
Keywords
artificial intelligence green marketing tourism and hospitality behavioral intention organizational green commitment

References

1.
Thủ tướng Chính phủ. (2020). Quyết định số 147/QĐ-TTg ngày 22/01/2020, phê duyệt Chiến lược phát triển du lịch Việt Nam đến năm 2030. https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?docid=198927&pageid=27160.
2.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
3.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
4.
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002.
5.
Bulchand-Gidumal, J., Secin, E. W., O'Connor, P., & Buhalis, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence's impact on hospitality and tourism marketing: Exploring key themes and addressing challenges. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(14), 2345-2362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2229480.
6.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
7.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
8.
Gajić, T., Vukolić, D., Bugarčić, J., Đoković, F., Spasojević, A., Knežević, S., Đorđević Boljanović, J., Glišić, S., Matović, S., & Dávid, L. D. (2024). The Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Serbian Hospitality: A Potential Path to Sustainable Practice. Sustainability, 16(8), 3172.
9.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
10.
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3 ed.). The Guilford Press.
11.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
12.
Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
13.
Ottman, J. A. (2011). The new rules of green marketing: Strategies, tools, and inspiration for sustainable branding. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
14.
Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510619733.
15.
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
16.
Stern, P. C. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
17.
Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books. https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=QWiwAAAAIAAJ.
18.
Thomas, G., Albishri, N. A., Islam, J. U., & Tanveer, M. (2025). Exploring the Determinants of Artificial Intelligence Adoption Intention in the SMEs of United Arab Emirates. Sage Open, 15(4), 21582440251395561. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251395561.