The influence of university-generated advertising content and student-generated organic content on university enrollment intention in the digital era

Abstract

In the digital era, online communication increasingly influences how prospective students obtain information and select universities. This study examines the effects of university-generated advertising content and student-generated organic content on university enrollment intention through brand image. Data were collected from 568 students who had searched for university admissions information in Vietnam and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results indicate that both content types positively affect brand image and enrollment intention. Student-generated content has a stronger direct effect on enrollment intention, whereas university-generated content contributes more strongly to brand image. Brand image also positively influences enrollment intention and significantly mediates both relationships. The study extends research on digital communication in higher education and provides practical implications for universities seeking to integrate official promotional content with authentic student experiences in their branding and recruitment strategies.
Keywords
university-generated advertising content student-generated organic content brand image university enrollment intention digital communication

References

1.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2.
Beerli Palacio, A., Díaz Meneses, G., & Pérez Pérez, P. J. (2002). The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 486-505. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210440311
3.
Cheung CM, L. M., Rabjohn N (2008). The impact of electronic word‐of‐mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290
4.
Constantinides, E., & Zinck Stagno, M. C. (2011). Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing: a segmentation study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2011.573593
5.
Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47-55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003
6.
Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Dennhardt, S., & Füller, J. (2013). The impact of user interactions in social media on brand awareness and purchase intention: the case of MINI on Facebook. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(5-6), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-05-2013-0299
7.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
8.
Maringe, F. (2006). University and course choice: Implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6), 466-479. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610683711 .
9.
Schivinski B, D. D. (2015). The impact of brand communication on brand equity through Facebook. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 09, 31–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2014-0007.
10.
Uoc, T. M. (2023). Digital transformation in higher education in Vietnam today. Revista Gestão e Secretariado, 14(8), 14582–14599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i8.2699.
11.
Xiong, L. (2023). It takes a village: examining how and when brand-specific transformational leadership affects employees in internal brand management. Journal of Brand Management, 30(4), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-022-00308-3.