Exploring engineers’ adoption of artificial intelligence: Insights into knowledge absorptive capacity, transparency, and risk awareness using BIBLO AI 5.0

Abstract

This study examines how knowledge absorptive capacity, AI system transparency, and perceived risk influence the adoption of artificial intelligence in engineering contexts. Drawing on bibliometric data from 2015 to 2026 and employing thematic, co-word, and knowledge network analyses, the findings reveal that engineers are more inclined to adopt AI systems that provide clear, interpretable, and task-relevant information. Knowledge absorptive capacity emerges as a critical enabler in converting AI-generated insights into practical value, whereas perceived risk continues to represent a substantial impediment to adoption. These results refine the understanding of the determinants of engineers’ technology acceptance and highlight pathways for developing AI systems that are more transparent, responsible, and aligned with the specific demands of the engineering domain.
Keywords
Bibliometrics AI acceptance knowledge absorptive capacity AI system transparency risk perception

References

1.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
2.
Ateeq, A., Siddiqui, S. A., Verma, A., Alnimer, R., Ateeq, R. A., & Almuraqab, N. A. S. (2026). AI in higher education HR: Assessing adoption and acceptance trends in administrative practices. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 642, 965-987. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-07220-7_84
3.
Di Stefano, G., Salerno, S., Matranga, D., Lodico, M., Monzani, D., Seidita, V., Cannella, R. C., Maniscalco, L., & Miceli, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence perceptions and technostress in staff radiologists: The mediating role of artificial intelligence acceptance and the moderating role of self efficacy. Behavioral Sciences, 15(9), 1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091276
4.
Gieselmann, M., Erdsiek, D., Rost, V., & Sassenberg, K. (2025). Do managers accept artificial intelligence? Insights into the role of business area and AI functionality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 108, 102804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2025.102804
5.
Li, J., & Zhao, H. (2026). Workflow embedded AI as a cognitive scaffold: A randomized trial on knowledge retention and diagnostic competency in undergraduate radiology education. European Journal of Radiology Open, 16, 100724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2026.100724
6.
Lin, X., & Wu, D. (2025). AI technology adoption, knowledge sharing, and manufacturing firms’ innovation performance: The moderating effect of absorptive capacity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 72, 2137-2149. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2025.3573176
7.
Xiong, P., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence as an assistive technology in language education: Investigating TPACK, self efficacy, and organisational support. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2561927
8.
Yao, K.-C., & Chiang, S. (2025). Mathematical modeling and structural equation analysis of acceptance behavior intention to AI medical diagnosis systems. Mathematics, 13(15), 2390. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13152390
9.
Zhang, C., Hu, M., Wu, W., Kamran, F., & Wang, X. (2025). Unpacking perceived risks and AI trust influences pre service teachers’ AI acceptance: A structural equation modeling based multi group analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 2645-2672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12905-7