Perceptions of distributive fairness and public attitudes toward the ban on gasoline-powered vehicles in Hanoi
Published: August 3, 2026
Abstract
This study employs a generalized ordered logit (gologit2) model to examine how perceptions of distributive fairness among government, businesses, and citizens influence public attitudes toward a policy banning gasoline-powered vehicles. The findings reveal that all three dimensions of perceived fairness exert statistically significant effects and substantially reshape public sentiment. Contrary to theoretical expectations, references to fairness in real-world contexts are associated with a higher likelihood of negative attitudes and a marked decline in positive or neutral responses. This pattern suggests that the public interprets fairness concerns in relation to perceived inadequacies and the burdens of transition costs. Overall, the study offers important insights into the dynamics of public perception in policy acceptance.
Keywords:
Keywords
distributive justicegasoline vehicle ban policypublic sentiment.
References
1.
[1] Brand, C and Anable, J. (2019), ‘Disruption’ and ‘continuity’ in transport energy systems: the case of the ban on new conventional fossil fuel vehicles, in proceedings of the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ECEEE) 2019 Summer Study, Hyères, France, pp. 1117-1127, truy cập từ <https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/147678/>.
2.
[2] Ha-Duong, M. (2025), Hanoi’s transition to fossil fuel free streets [Hạn chế xe xăng: bước đi táo bạo cho mục tiêu bền vững], post-print hal-05196014, École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Université Paris-Saclay, truy cập từ <https://enpc.hal.science/hal-05196014/>.
3.
[3] Harring, N., Ndwiga, M., Nordén, A., Slunge, D. (2024), public acceptability of policy instruments for reducing fossil fuel consumption in East Africa, climate policy, 24(6), 812-827, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2302319.
[4] Huber, R., Wicki, M., Bernauer, T. (2019), Public support for environmental policy depends on beliefs concerning effectiveness, intrusiveness, and fairness, environmental politics, 29(4), 649-673, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1629171.
[5] Kemp, S. (2024), Digital 2024: Vietnam, DataReportal, We Are Social và Meltwater, truy cập từ https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-vietnam
6.
[6] Kito, M., Nakamoto, Y., Kagawa, S., Hienuki, S., Hubacek, K. (2024), Environmental consequences of Japan’s ban on sale of new fossil fuel-powered passenger vehicles from 2035, journal of cleaner production, 437, 140658, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140658.
[7] Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., van den Bergh, J. (2019), perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature, climate policy, 19(9), 1186-1204, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1639490.
[8] Rawls, J. (1971), a theory of justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, truy cập từ <https://archive.org/details/theoryofjustice0000rawl>.
9.
[9] Wei, Y., Gong, P., Zhang, J., Wang, L. (2021), Exploring public opinions on climate change policy in “big data era”: a case study of the European Union emission trading system (EU-ETS) based on Twitter, energy policy, 158, 112569, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112569.
