Innovations in the accounting training of higher education institutions in Vietnam and in the world in the post-COVID-19 era

TS. Trần Ngọc Hùng; Nguyễn Ngọc Minh; Đỗ Thị Thanh Ngân

Issue: Số 26 - Tháng 12 - 2022 Quản trị - Quản lý

Innovations in the accounting training of higher education institutions in Vietnam and in the world in the post-COVID-19 era

Published: July 31, 2026

Abstract

This paper introduces the changes in accounting training of higher education institutions in Vietnam in particular and in the world in general before and after the Covid-19 pandemic. The paper also points out how these changes can be developed into the new normal. Based on collected papers and reports, this paper reviews the innovations in accounting training activities in the world and in Vietnam to highlight outstanding issues faced during and after the pandemic, and analyzes these innovations’ impacts on the accounting training digitalization in the future. This paper is expected to provide a new research orientation for future studies on the accounting training digitalization in the post-COVID-19 era in Vietnam.

Keywords

Covid-19 accounting training higher education institution.

References

Adel Sarea, Abdulla Alhadrami and Ghilan Al-Madhagy Taufiq-Hail (2021). COVID-19 and digitizing accounting education: empirical evidence from GCC. PSU Research Review, 5(1), 68-83.

Al-Hadrami, A. and Morris, D. (2014). Accounting students performance in web-based courses: the case of the hashemite university of Jordan. World Review of Business Research, 4(1), 19-35.

Bensaid, B. and Brahimi, T. (2020). Copping with covid-19: higher education in the GCC region. [Online] Available at www.researchgate.net/publication/ 342624704_COPING_WITH_COVID-19_Higher_ Education_ in_ the_GCC_Countries

Dowling, C., Godfrey, J.M. and Gyles, N. (2003). Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting learning outcomes of students? Accounting Education, 12(4), 373-391.

Harber, J. and Mills, M. (2008). Perceptions of barriers concerning effective online teaching and policies: Florida community college faculty. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 3, 266-283.

Helfaya, A. (2018). Assessing the use of computer-based assessment-feedback in teaching digital accountants. Accounting Education, 2018, 1-31.

Hislop, G.W. and Ellis, H.J. (2004). A study of faculty effort in online teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 71(1), 15-31.

Horvitz, B.S., Beach, A.L., Anderson, M.L. and Xia, J. (2014). Examination of faculty self-efficacy related to online teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 305-316.

Jia, D., Bhatti, A. and Nahavandi, S. (2014). The impact of selfefficacy and perceived system efficacy on effectiveness of virtual training systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 33(1), 16-35.

10.

Liberman, J. Levin, V. and Luna-Bazaldua, D. (2020). Are students still learning during COVID-19? Formative assessment can provide the answer. [Online] Available at https://blogs. worldbank.org/education/are-students-still-learning-during-covid-19-formative-assessment-can provide-answer.

11.

Lim, M. (2020). Educating despite the COVID-19 outbreak: lessons from Singapore. [Online] Available at: www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/educating-despite-covid-19-outbreak-lessons-singapore

12.

Liu, S., Kim, K.J., Bonk, C.J. and Magjuka, R. (2007). What do online MBA professors have to say about online teaching? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(2), 1-6.

13.

McKenney, C., Peffley, E. and Teolis, I., Teaching Methods, Comparison of time investment in common teaching practices among three instructional methods, Vol. 20, pp. 245-249, 2010.

14.

Nakayama, M., Yamamoto, H. and Santiago, R. (2006). The impact of learner characteristics on learning performance in hybrid courses among japanese students. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 5(3), 95-206.

15.

Shea, P. (2007). Bridges and barriers to teaching online college courses: a study of experienced online faculty in thirty-six colleges. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Environments, 11(2), 73-128.

16.

Van de Vord, R. and Pogue, K. (2012). Teaching time investment: does online really take more time than face-to-face? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 132-146.

17.

Vatovec, C. and Balser, T. (2009). Podcasts as tools in introductory environmental studies. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 10(1), 19-24.

18.

Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Doll, W., Deng, X. and Williams, M., Behaviour and Information Technology, The impact of organisational support, technical support, and self-efficacy on faculty perceived benefits of using learning management system, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 311-319, 2018.