Ảnh hưởng của phong cách lãnh đạo chuyên quyền đến sự sáng tạo: Tác động trung gian của động lực nội tại và hành vi chia sẻ tri thức
Published: July 31, 2026
Abstract
Nghiên cứu này nhằm phân tích tác động của phong cách lãnh đạo chuyên quyền đối với sự sáng tạo thông qua việc sử dụng phương pháp phân tích định lượng và phân tích mô hình cấu trúc bình phương nhỏ nhất từng phần (PLS-SEM). Kết quả nghiên cứu cho thấy, phong cách lãnh đạo chuyên quyền có ảnh hưởng tiêu cực đến sự sáng tạo thông qua tác động trung gian của các biến số, gồm: động lực nội tại và hành vi chia sẻ tri thức.
Keywords
lãnh đạo chuyên quyềnsự sáng tạođộng lực nội tạihành vi chia sẻ tri thứcPLS-SEM
References
1.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
2.
Amabile, T. M. (2013). Componential Theory of Creativity. In E. H. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Management Theory (pp. 134-139). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Ltd.
3.
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in organizational behavior, 36, 157-183.
4.
Aronson, E. (2001). Integrating Leadership Styles and Ethical Perspectives. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 18(4), 244-256.
5.
Avolio, B. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62(1), 25-33.
6.
Bavik, Y. L., Tang, P. M., Shao, R., & Lam, L. W. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Exploring dual-mediation paths. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 322-332.
7.
Chen, J.-K., & Chen, I. S. (2012). Critical creativity criteria for students in higher education: taking the interrelationship effect among dimensions into account. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1057-1075.
8.
Chiang, H. H., Nielsen, P., Han, T. S., & Chuang, J. S. (2011). The relationship between high-commitment HRM and knowledge-sharing behavior and its mediators. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5/6), 604-622.
9.
Contreras, F., Juarez, F., et. al. (2020). Critical factors for innovative work behaviour in Latin American firms: Test of an exploratory model. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1-27.
10.
De Clercq, D., Fatima, T., & Jahanzeb, S. (2021). Ingratiating with Despotic Leaders to Gain Status: The Role of Power Distance Orientation and Self-enhancement Motive. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(1), 157-174.
11.
De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297-311.
12.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (1 ed.). New York: Springer Science & Business Media New York.
13.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 49(1), 14-23.
14.
DiLiello, T. C., & Houghton, J. D. (2010). Leadership development: the key to unlocking individual creativity in organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(3), 230-245.
15.
Gamlath, S., & Wilson, T. (2020). Dimensions of student-to-student knowledge sharing in universities. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 20(4), 542-556.
16.
Gu, J., He, C., & Liu, H. (2015). Supervisory styles and graduate student creativity: the mediating roles of creative self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 721-742.
17.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7): Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
18.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (Second edition ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
19.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
Lazarides, R., Rohowski, S., Ohlemann, S., & Ittel, A. (2015). The role of classroom characteristics for students’ motivation and career exploration. Educational Psychology, 36(5), 992-1008.
22.
Lee, J. (2018). The Effects of Knowledge Sharing on Individual Creativity in Higher Education Institutions: Socio-Technical View. Administrative Sciences, 8(21), 1-16.
23.
Mainemelis, C., Kark, R., & Epitropaki, O. (2015). Creative Leadership: A Multi-Context Conceptualization. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 393-482.
24.
Malik, M. J., Ahmad, M., Kamran, M. R., Aliza, K., & Elahi, M. Z. (2020). Student use of social media, academic performance, and creativity: the mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(4), 403-415.
25.
Meng, Y., Tan, J., & Li, J. (2017). Abusive supervision by academic supervisors and postgraduate research students' creativity: the mediating role of leader-member exchange and intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(5), 605-617.
26.
Nauman, S., Zheng, C., & Basit, A. A. (2021). How despotic leadership jeopardizes employees' performance: the roles of quality of work life and work withdrawal. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(1), 1-16.
27.
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Societal and school influences on student creativity: The case of China. Psychology in the Schools, 40(1), 103-114.
28.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
30.
Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45-54.
31.
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96.
32.
Schepers, P., & van den Berg, P. T. (2007). Social Factors of Work-Environment Creativity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 407-428.
33.
Schilling, J. (2009). From Ineffectiveness to Destruction: A Qualitative Study on the Meaning of Negative Leadership. Leadership, 5(1), 102-128.
34.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958.
35.
Tsai, C.-Y., Horng, J.-S., Liu, C.-H., Hu, D.-C., & Chung, Y.-C. (2015). Awakening student creativity: Empirical evidence in a learning environment context. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 17, 28-38.
36.
Wang, C.-J., Tsai, H.-T., & Tsai, M.-T. (2014). Linking transformational leadership and employee creativity in the hospitality industry: The influences of creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and job complexity. Tourism Management, 40, 79-89.
37.
Yuen, T. J., & Majid, M. S. (2007). Knowledge-sharing patterns of undergraduate students in Singapore. Library Review, 56(6), 485-494.
38.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.
