Determinants of students’ continued intention to engage in online learning programs
Published: July 25, 2026
Abstract
This study investigates the key factors influencing students’ intention to continue with e-learning in the context of distance education. The findings reveal that satisfaction, task-technology fit, trust, performance expectancy, and social influence significantly impact students’ continued learning intentions. In contrast, effort expectancy does not show a significant effect. These results offer valuable empirical evidence for educational institutions to refine their e-learning strategies, enhance the quality of learning experiences, and sustain student motivation in digital learning environments.
Al Rawashdeh, A. Z., et al. (2021). Advantages and Disadvantages of Using e-Learning in University Education: Analyzing Students’ Perspectives. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19(2), 107-117.
2.
Alghamdi, S. R., & Bayaga, A. (2016). Use and attitude towards Learning Management Systems (LMS) in Saudi Arabian universities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2309-2330.
3.
Alqudah, N. M., Jammal, H. M., Saleh, O., Khader, Y., Obeidat, N., & Alqudah, J. (2020). Perception and experience of academic Jordanian ophthalmologists with e-learning for undergraduate course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 59, 44-47.
4.
Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28-38.
5.
Alshurideh, M., Al-Gasaymeh, A., Ahmed, G., Alzoubi, H., & Al Kurdi, B. (2020). Loyalty program effectiveness: Theoretical reviews and practical proofs. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8, 599-612.
6.
Amrouni, K. I. A., et al. (2019). A Systematic Review: Factors Affecting Employees' Adoption of E-government Using an Integration of UTAUT & TTF Theories. Available at: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/512947-a-systematic-review-factors-affecting-em-6942e19b.pdf
7.
Batucan, G. B., Gonzales, G. G., Balbuena, M. G., Pasaol, K. R. B., Seno, D. N., & Gonzales, R. R. (2022). An Extended UTAUT Model to Explain Factors Affecting Online Learning System Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of a Developing Economy. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 768831.
8.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
9.
Chaka, J. G., & Govender, I. (2020). Implementation of mobile learning using a social network platform: Facebook. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(1), 24-47.
10.
Cheng, Y. M. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of e-learning acceptance. Information Systems Journal, 21(3), 269-299.
11.
Grah, B., & Penger, S. (2021). COVID-19 and the Challenges of Transition to Online Learning. ENTRENOVA - Enterprise Research Innovation, 7(1), 131-145.
12.
Hean, O., & Chairassamee, N. (2023). Distance learning during COVID-19 school closures. International Journal of Social Economics, 50(10), 1439-1452.
13.
Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18, 38-50.
14.
Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260-272.
15.
Kaliaskarova, A., Zhundybaeva, T., Triyono, M. B., & Kassymova, G. K. (2022). Blended learning as an effective method for school and university teachers of Kazakhstan. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 12(3), 265-272.
16.
Looi, K. H., Wye, C. K., & Abdul Bahri, E. N. (2022). Achieving learning outcomes of emergency remote learning to sustain higher education during crises: An empirical study of Malaysian undergraduates. Sustainability, 14(3), 1598.
17.
McGill, T. J., Klobas, J. E., & Renzi, S. (2014). Critical success factors for the continuation of e-learning initiatives. Internet and Higher Education, 22, 24-36.
18.
Mirjana Kocaleva, Igor Stojanovic, & Zoran Zdravev (2015). Model of e-Learning Acceptance and Use for Teaching Staff in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 4, 23-31.
19.
Ngampornchai, A., & Adams, J. (2016). Students’ Acceptance and Readiness for E-Learning in North Eastern Thailand. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(34), 1-13.
20.
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696.
21.
Rui Yuan, & Icy Lee (2016). “I need to be strong and competent”: A narrative inquiry of a student-teacher’s emotions and identities in teaching practicum. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(7), 819-841.
22.
Salloum, S. A., Alhamad, A. Q. M., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access, 7, 128445-128462.
23.
Salmani, N., Bagheri, I., & Dadgari, A. (2022). Iranian nursing students experiences regarding the status of e-learning during COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0263388.
24.
Tarhini, A., Hone, K. S., & Liu, X. (2017). A cross-cultural examination of the impact of social, organisational and individual factors on educational technology acceptance between British and Lebanese university students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 1023-1041.
25.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
