Số phát hành: Số 16 - Tháng 6 - 2026Quản trị - Quản lý
Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng sự sẵn sàng tiếp nhận mô hình số sinh đôi tại các cảng biển Việt Nam
Xuất bản: tháng 8 3, 2026
doi:10.62831/nckh.2026.371.v1
Tóm tắt
Nghiên cứu nhằm khảo sát các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến mức độ sẵn sàng tiếp nhận công nghệ mô hình số sinh đôi của nhân viên hiện trường tại các cảng biển Việt Nam. Nghiên cứu tiến hành phân tích 320 mẫu hợp lệ bằng phương pháp PLS-SEM, kết quả cho thấy, nhận thức về sự hữu ích thúc đẩy mạnh mẽ mức độ sẵn sàng, trong khi áp lực công việc hiện trường đóng vai trò là biến điều tiết tích cực quan trọng. Sự hỗ trợ từ ban quản lý và chất lượng dữ liệu giúp nâng cao đáng kể sự chấp nhận công nghệ mới này.
Từ khóa
mô hình số sinh đôimô hình chấp nhận công nghệlogistics cảng biểnmức độ sẵn sàng của nhân viên hiện trườngPLS-SEM
Tài liệu tham khảo
1.
Al-Adwan A., Li N., Al-Adwan A., Abbasi G., Albelbis N., & Habibi A. (2023). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3.
Al-Ateeq B., Sawan N., Al‐Hajaya K., Altarawneh M., & Al-Makhadmeh A. (2022). Big data analytics in auditing and the consequences for audit quality: A study using the technology acceptance model (TAM). Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i1p5.
Brunila O., Kunnaala-Hyrkki V., & Inkinen T. (2021). Hindrances in port digitalization? Identifying problems in adoption and implementation. European Transport Research Review, 13, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00523-0.
Dihan M., Akash A., Tasneem Z., Das P., Das S., et al. (2024). Digital twin: Data exploration, architecture, implementation and future. Heliyon, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26503.
Fam K., Liu Y., Wei S., Edu T., Zaharia R., & Negricea C. (2024). Modeling New Technology Readiness and Acceptance in the Case of B2B Marketing Employees. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 32, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712x.2024.2364699.
Galkin A., Samchuk G., Kopytkov D., & Thompson R. (2025). Digital twins in logistics: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis for advancing smart cities and sustainable development. Discover Sustainability, 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01754-0.
Gardas B., Gunasekaran A., & Narwane V. (2023). Unlocking factors of digital twins for smart manufacturing: a case of emerging economy. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 37, 1463 - 1493. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2023.2257655.
Kim D., Kim G., Noh S. (2025). Digital Twin-Based Prediction and Optimization for Dynamic Supply Chain Management. Machines. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13020109.
Liu Y., Zhao S. (2025). Adoption of digital logistics platforms in the maritime logistics industry: based on diffusion of innovations and extended technology acceptance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04969-8.
Moshood T., Nawanir G., Sorooshian S., & Okfalisa O. (2021). Digital Twins Driven Supply Chain Visibility within Logistics: A New Paradigm for Future Logistics. Applied System Innovation, 4, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4020029.
Nguyen H. P., Nguyen P. Q. P., & Nguyen T. P. (2022). Green Port Strategies in Developed Coastal Countries as Useful Lessons for the Path of Sustainable Development: A case study in Vietnam. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2022.46539.
Nguyen Trung Hieu (2024). Investigating Driving Factors of Digital Transformation in the Vietnam Shipping Companies: Applied for TOE Framework. SAGE Open, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241301210.
Nikou S., Reuver M., & Kanafi M. (2022). Workplace literacy skills - how information and digital literacy affect adoption of digital technology. Journal of Documentation, 78, 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-12-2021-0241.
Shamsi M., Iakovleva T., Olsen E., & Bagozzi R. (2021). Employees’ Work-Related Well-Being during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated Perspective of Technology Acceptance Model and JD-R Theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211888.
Siagian H., Tarigan Z., Basana S., & Basuki R. (2022). The effect of perceived security, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness on consumer behavioral intention through trust in digital payment platform. International Journal of Data and Network Science. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.2.010.
Turner J., Vorraro G., Liu H., Rockstroh T. et al. (2023). Blue Seaports: The Smart, Sustainable and Electrified Ports of the Future. Smart Cities. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6030074.
Ullah S., Kiani U., Raza B., & Mustafa A. (2022). Consumers’ Intention to Adopt m-payment/m-banking: The Role of Their Financial Skills and Digital Literacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873708.
Wang W., Chen L., Xiong M., & Wang Y. (2021). Accelerating AI Adoption with Responsible AI Signals and Employee Engagement Mechanisms in Health Care. Information Systems Frontiers, 25, 2239 - 2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10154-4.
Ward R., Choudary R., Singh M., Roumpani F. et al. (2023). The challenges of using live-streamed data in a predictive digital twin. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 16, 609 - 630. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2023.2187463.
Warsono H., Yuwono T., & Putranti I. (2022). Analyzing technology acceptance model for collaborative governance in public administration: Empirical evidence of digital governance and perceived ease of use. International Journal of Data and Network Science. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.12.008.
Zaidi S., Khan S., & Chaabane A. (2024). Unlocking the Potential of Digital Twins in Supply Chains: A Systematic Review. Supply Chain Analytics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2024.100075.
Zhou F., Yu K., Xie W., Lyu J., Zheng Z., Zhou S. (2024). Digital Twin-Enabled Smart Maritime Logistics Management in the Context of Industry 5.0. IEEE Access, 12, 10920-10931. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3354838.
