The Impact of Shadow Banking on Bank Capital Adequacy Ratio in Vietnam: Moderating Role of Corporate Governance

Tóm tắt

This study investigates the impact of shadow banking on the capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of listed Vietnamese commercial banks from 2012 to 2022, emphasizing the moderating role of corporate governance.

Results show a positive relationship between shadow banking and CAR, highlighting benefits in income diversification and capital optimization. Gender diversity on boards enhances this effect, while larger board sizes diminish governance effectiveness.

This study offers valuable insights for policymakers, underscoring the importance of balancing financial innovation with effective risk management and governance to ensure banking stability.

Từ khóa
shadow banking corporate governance bank risk management

Tài liệu tham khảo

1.
1. Adams, R. and Mehran, H. (2012). Bank board structure and performance: Evidence for large bank holding companies. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21(2), 243-267. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2011.09.002.
2.
2. Adams, R.B., Hermalin, B.E., and Weisbach, M.S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58-107. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58.
3.
3. Ahmed Abdel Karim. (1996). The significance of capital adequacy regulation for banks: A survey of international evidence. Banking and Finance Review, 8, 1-18.
4.
4. Adrian, T. (2014). Financial stability policies for shadow banking. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report, No. 664. Available at: https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr664.pdf
5.
5. Byrnes, J.P., Miller, D.C., and Schafer, W.D. (1999). Gender differences in risk-taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367.
6.
6. Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: Gee.
7.
7. Cetorelli, N. (2014). The evolution of bank complexity. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 20(2), 85-106.
8.
8. Dao, B.T. and Nguyen, H.T. (2020). Banking stability and financial performance: Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(2), 35.
9.
9. Ding, S., Ongena, S., and Zhang, Q. (2020). The impact of shadow banking on credit creation. China Economic Review, 64, 101553.
10.
10. Erhardt, N.L., Werbel, J.D., and Shrader, C.B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102-111.
11.
11. Gupta, A. and Kashiramka, S. (2020). Financial stability, competition, and shadow banking in emerging economies. Emerging Markets Review, 40, 100665.
12.
12. Guofeng, S. (2019). Shadow banking in China: Regulatory arbitrage and financial innovation. China Economic Review, 59, 101108.
13.
13. Humera, K. (2011). A literature review of corporate governance. International Journal of Governance, 3(2), 1-9.
14.
14. Jensen, M.C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
15.
15. Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
16.
16. Nguyen, N.T., Nguyen, A.T., Le, T.H.T., and To, H.T.N. (2023). The impact of bank competition on bank stability in Vietnam: The moderating role of shadow banking. Cogent Economics and Finance.
17.
17. Pozsar, Z., Adrian, T., Ashcraft, A.B., and Boesky, H. (2013). Shadow banking. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, No. 458.
18.
18. Robinson, G. and Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21-31.
19.
19. Wen, Y., Wang, X., and Zhang, L. (2017). Shadow banking and financial stability in China. China Economic Review, 45, 20-36.
20.
20. Zhang, L., Zhang, W., and Wang, X. (2022). The shadow banking system in transitional economies. Emerging Markets Review, 48, 101710.