Số phát hành: Số 26 - Tháng 12 - 2024Tài chính - Ngân hàng - Bảo hiểm
Examining the Impact of Perceived Investment Risk on Financial Investment Intention of Gen Z
Xuất bản: tháng 7 29, 2026
Tóm tắt
This study explores the influence of perceived investment risks on the financial investment intentions of Vietnamese Generation Z, focusing on five dimensions: economic, functional, psychological, social, and time risks. Employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) on data from 251 valid responses, the findings reveal that economic risk significantly impacts investment intentions, while functional, psychological, social, and time risks exhibit no significant effects. These results underscore the prominence of economic considerations in shaping Generation Z’s investment behavior, offering valuable insights for policymakers and financial institutions aiming to engage this demographic effectively.
Từ khóa
Gen Zperceived riskinvestment intentionfinancial behavior
Tài liệu tham khảo
1.
1. Agárdi, I., & Alt, M. A. (2024). Do digital natives use mobile payment differently than digital immigrants? A comparative study between generation X and Z. Electronic Commerce Research, 24(3), 1463–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09537-9
2. Anantadjaya, S. P., Setiawan, B. A., Violin, V., Moridu, I., & Bailusy, M. N. (2023). Exploring Financial Technology’s Impact On Generation Z Transaction Knowledge. Jurnal Scientia, 12(03), 3945–3951.
3.
3. Aripratiwi, R. A. (2023). Gender Does not Strengthen Investment Knowledge and Motivation in Generation Z. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectuals’ Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2022), 750, 289.
4.
4. Awaluddin, M., Molina, M., Nurlia, N., & Isra, W. (2023). Determining Factors For Young Investors To Invest In The Capital Market. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5), 92.
5.
5. Duong, H. T., Nguyen, H. T., McFarlane, S. J., & Nguyen, L. T. V. (2024). Risk perception and COVID-19 preventive behaviors: Application of the integrative model of behavioral prediction. The Social Science Journal, 61(4), 873–886.
6.
6. Ediagbonya, V., & Tioluwani, C. (2023). The role of fintech in driving financial inclusion in developing and emerging markets: Issues, challenges and prospects. Technological Sustainability, 2(1), 100–119.
7.
7. Guo, W., & Luo, Q. (2023). Investigating the impact of intelligent personal assistants on the purchase intentions of Generation Z consumers: The moderating role of brand credibility. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103353.
8.
8. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
9.
9. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
10.
10. Kumari, J. S., Senani, K. G. P., & Ajward, R. (2022). Predicting investors’ intention to invest in the stock market during COVID-19: Can we use an extended theory of planned behavior? Journal of Asia Business Studies, 17(4), 681–700.
11.
11. Munnukka, J., Uusitalo, O., & Koivisto, V.-J. (2017). The consequences of perceived risk and objective knowledge for consumers’ investment behavior. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 22(4), 150–160.
12.
12. Pandurugan, V., & Al Shammakhi, B. N. S. (2024). Modelling the theory of planned behaviour to evaluate the investment intention of Generation Z in the speculative market: Stocks, Forex and cryptocurrencies. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research.
13.
13. Pangestu, S., & Karnadi, E. B. (2020). The effects of financial literacy and materialism on the savings decision of Generation Z Indonesians. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1743618.
14.
14. Sconti, A. (2022). Digital vs. in-person financial education: What works best for Generation Z? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 194, 300–318.
15.
15. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of Risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285.
16.
16. Sobaih, A. E. E., & Elshaer, I. A. (2023). Risk-taking, financial knowledge, and risky investment intention: Expanding theory of planned behavior using a moderating-mediating model. Mathematics, 11(2), 453.
17.
17. Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (2018). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? In The Institutional Dynamics of Culture (Vols. I & II, pp. 243–262). Routledge.
18.
18. Yordudom, T., Imjai, N., Usman, B., & Aujirapongpan, S. (2024). Unveiling the impact of social skills and financial literacy on internship performance: Insights from Thai Generation Z hospitality students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101012.
19.
19. Zheng, J., Li, E., & Liu, T. (2023). From Web2.0 to Web5.0: The Psychological Belongingness of Gen-Z in the Context of Digital Diversification. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–17.
Cùng chuyên mục
Bài viết liên quan
Các bài trong chuyên đề «Tài chính - Ngân hàng - Bảo hiểm».
