The role of labor structural transformation and industrial productivity in Vietnam’s economic growth: An ARDL bounds testing approach

Abstract

This study examines the role of labor structural transformation and industrial productivity in Vietnam’s economic growth during the period 1995–2024 using the ARDL method. The results reveal a long-term cointegration relationship among variables, with the ECM model confirming a stable adjustment toward equilibrium. In the long run, capital and industrial value added have positive but statistically insignificant effects, while agricultural labor has a negative effect, consistent with structural transformation theory. In the short run, capital and industrial productivity exert stronger impacts. The findings support the Lewis dual-sector model and emphasize the importance of labor reallocation and industrial development for long-term growth.
Keywords
structural change labor transformation industrial productivity economic growth ARDL developing economy

References

1.
Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., & Mestre, R. (1998). Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267–283.
2.
Bertelli, S., Vacca, G., & Zoia, M. G. (2022). Bootstrap Cointegration Tests in ARDL Models (Working Paper No. 2204.04939v1). arXiv.
3.
Do, T. T., & Zhang, J. H. (2016). ARDL bounds testing approach to cointegration: Relationship international trade policy reform and foreign trade in Vietnam. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(8), 84-98.
4.
Duyên, T. T. M. (2023). Ứng dụng mô hình ARDL đánh giá mối quan hệ vay nợ nước ngoài và tăng trưởng kinh tế tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Tài chính - Marketing, 14(2), 2-12.
5.
Gollin, D. (2014). The Lewis model: A 60-year retrospective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 71-88.
6.
Hà, N. T. T. (2021). Ứng dụng mô hình ARDL đánh giá mối quan hệ giữa thất nghiệp và tăng trưởng kinh tế ở Việt Nam. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh - Kinh tế và Quản trị Kinh doanh, 16(3), 68-80.
7.
Herrendorf, B., Rogerson, R., & Valentinyi, Á. (2014). Growth and structural transformation. Trong P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Chủ biên), Handbook of Economic Growth (Tập 2, tr. 855-941). Elsevier.
8.
Hoai, D. T. T., Tarp, F., van Seventer, D., & Hoa, H. C. (2016). Growth and structural transformation in Viet Nam during the 2000s (WIDER Working Paper No. 2016/108). UNU-WIDER.
9.
Simon Kuznets, S. (1973). Modern economic growth: Findings and reflections. The American Economic Review, 63(3), 247-258.
10.
Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139-191.
11.
Menegaki, A. N. (2019). The ARDL method in the energy-growth nexus field; best implementation strategies. Economies, 7(4), 105.
12.
Nam, L. P., Hien, H. T., Song, N. V., Hieu, N. M., Tra, D. T., & Luong, N. T. (2023). Nexus between CO2 emissions and economic growth, industrial production, and foreign direct investment in Vietnam: Symmetric ARDL approach. Journal of Environmental Protection, 14, 637-659.
13.
Narayan, P. K. (2004). Fiji's tourism demand: The ARDL approach to cointegration. Tourism Economics, 10(2), 193-206.
14.
Nguyen, H. M., & Ngoc, B. H. (2020). Energy consumption - economic growth nexus in Vietnam: An ARDL approach with a structural break. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(1), 101-110.
15.
Nguyen, N. T. K., & Le, M. B. (2018). CO2 emissions and economic growth in Vietnam: An ARDL bound testing approach. Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, 6(1), 47-55.
16.
Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2002). Long-run structural modelling. Econometric Reviews, 21(1), 49-87.
17.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
18.
Tang, T. C. (2016). ARDL cointegration tests for beginner (Visiting Scholar Program materials). University of Malaya.
19.
Vu, K. M. (2017). Structural change and economic growth: Empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 41, 64-77.
20.
Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2010). Bounds test approach to cointegration and causality between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy, 38(1), 52-58.
21.
Xing, H. (2023). Structural transformation and structural switching in multi-sector catching-up economies (Working Paper). Stony Brook University