A theoretical framework for the impact of managerial support on students’ intention to continue part-time work

Abstract

This study proposes a theoretical framework explaining the effect of perceived supervisor support on part-time student workers’ intention to stay, mediated by job satisfaction. Drawing on a synthesis of academic literature, the article applies Social Exchange Theory and Organizational Support Theory to develop a model with four hypotheses. The relationships between perceived supervisor support and job satisfaction, and between job satisfaction and intention to stay, receive strong scholarly support, whereas the direct relationship between supervisor support and intention to stay remains ambiguous and requires further empirical testing. The study identifies research gaps concerning the measurement of intention to stay, the absence of scales adapted specifically for student workers, and the limited number of multidisciplinary studies in Vietnam. It therefore proposes the supervisor support - job satisfaction - intention to stay model as a direction for future research.
Keywords
perceived supervisor support job satisfaction intention to stay part-time student workers social exchange theory organizational support theory

References

1.
Almalki, S., Al-Otaibi, M., & Al-Hassani, H. (2023). Perceived supervisor support and retention intentions among academic staff in public universities. Journal of Higher Education Management, 15(2), 45-58.
2.
Armstrong-Stassen, M., & Ursel, N. D. (2009). Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the retention of older workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X288838.
3.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.
4.
Bothma, C. F., & Roodt, G. (2013). The validation of the Turnover Intention Scale (TIS-6). SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v39i2.1108.
5.
Bowling, N. A., & Hammond, G. D. (2008). A meta-analytic examination of the construct validity of the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.004.
6.
Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., Jr., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler III, P. H. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71-138). Wiley-Interscience.
7.
Choi, H. M., & Kim, W. G. (2021). Supervisor support and student employee retention in hospitality: Job satisfaction as a mechanism. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 97, 102950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102950.
8.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
9.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500.
10.
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565.
11.
Gordon, S., Adler, H., & Day, J. (2019). Empowering leadership and part-time employee retention in service sector. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 39, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhospman.2019.03.011.
12.
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-488.
13.
Huertas-Valdivia, I., Özkan, O. S., Arias-Viñuela, E., & Dimanche, F. (2026). Reducing turnover intention in theme parks: How supervisor support builds embeddedness and satisfaction. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 48(3), 437-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2025-0016.
14.
Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2018). Meta-analysis on perceived supervisor support and employee outcomes.
15.
Nancarrow, S. A., Bradbury, J., Pit, S. W., & Ariss, S. (2014). Intention to stay and intention to leave: Are they two sides of the same coin? BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-38.
16.
Nguyen, H., & Le, T. (2023). Perceived supervisor support and intention to stay among part-time student workers in Vietnam. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2189012.
17.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
18.
Teresia, M., Ardi, & Sunarjo, R. A. (2024). The influence of compensation, perceived supervisor support, and career development on intention to stay with job satisfaction as a mediating variable in XYZ manufacturing employees. Syntax Literate, 9(9), 4767-4783. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i9.16406.
19.
Tran, V., & Pham, T. (2021). Job satisfaction and intention to stay in the retail sector.
20.
Vũ Việt Hằng & Nguyễn Văn Thông. (2020). Sự hài lòng trong công việc, mối quan hệ với cam kết tổ chức và ý định nghỉ việc - Trường hợp các nhân viên kỹ thuật ngành dịch vụ cơ sở hạ tầng công nghệ thông tin. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh - Kinh tế và Quản trị kinh doanh, 13(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.13.2.518.2018