Effects of AI chatbots on Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering students’ self-learning ability

Abstract

This study examines how perceived characteristics of AI chatbots affect the self-learning ability of students at Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering and clarifies the mediating roles of learning self-efficacy and learning motivation. Survey data from 356 students were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS 4. The results support most of the proposed hypotheses, and the model explains a substantial proportion of the variance in self-learning ability. Learning self-efficacy has the largest total effect, followed by learning motivation. Notably, most chatbot characteristics influence self-learning mainly through learners’ internal psychological mechanisms rather than through direct effects. The study recommends strengthening self-efficacy, sustaining motivation, and creating guided, critical, and responsible conditions for chatbot-supported learning.
Keywords
AI chatbot self-learning ability learning self-efficacy learning motivation PLS-SEM

References

1.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
2.
Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with artificial intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments.
3.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
4.
Esiyok, E., Gokcearslan, S., & Kucukergin, K. G. (2025). Acceptance of educational use of AI chatbots in the context of self-directed learning with technology and ICT self-efficacy of undergraduate students. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(1), 641-650.
5.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
6.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE.
7.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.
8.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7.
9.
Nguyen, Q. N., & Doan, D. T. H. (2025). ChatGPT's effects on EFL learners' autonomy and self-efficacy in self-regulated learning contexts. The JALT CALL Journal, 21(2), 102968.
10.
Ran, X., Li, Z., & Yang, Y. (2025). An analysis of factors influencing chatbots on college students' programming self-learning ability. SAGE Open, 15(3), 1-14.
11.
Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865-1886.
12.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4 [Computer software]. SmartPLS GmbH.
13.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
14.
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347.
15.
Tian, W., Ge, J., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, X. (2024). AI chatbots in Chinese higher education: Adoption, perception, and influence among graduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1268549.
16.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
17.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.