Factors influencing purchase intention in virtual stores: An empirical study in Vietnam

Abstract

Advances in virtual reality technology are creating new shopping experiences, with virtual stores offering greater interactivity and immersion than traditional e-commerce. This study identifies factors influencing purchase intention in virtual stores among Generation Z consumers in Vietnam. A quantitative approach and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) were used to test the research model and hypotheses. The findings show that technology perceptions, experience, and trust contribute to the formation of purchase intention, while attitude, trust, and satisfaction serve as mediators in the model. The study clarifies the mechanisms underlying purchase intention in virtual store environments and provides implications for developing virtual shopping experiences in Vietnam.
Keywords
virtual stores purchase intention virtual reality Gen Z e-commerce

References

1.
Hiệp hội Thương mại điện tử Việt Nam, V. (2025). Báo cáo Chỉ số Thương mại điện tử Việt Nam 2025.
2.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
3.
Alkarney, W., & Almakki, R. (2022). Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Virtual Stores: Perspectives of Consumers in Saudi Arabia. Mobile Information Systems, 2022(1), 8340406. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8340406
4.
Chen, L. da, Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39(8), 705–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00127-6
5.
Cheong, S.-N., Tan, S.-H., Tan, J.-H., Permadi, D., Tan, Y.-F., Ooi, C.-P., & Ling, H.-C. (2026). Examining Young Adults’ Willingness to Adopt Virtual Reality for Real Estate Purchases. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 55(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.37934/ARASET.55.2.234246
6.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
7.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 2009 41:4, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
8.
Harris, L. C., & Goode, M. M. H. (2010). Online servicescapes, trust, and purchase intentions. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(3), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011040631
9.
Krasonikolakis, I., Vrechopoulos, A., Pouloudi, A., & Dimitriadis, S. (2018). Store layout effects on consumer behavior in 3D online stores. European Journal of Marketing, 52(5–6), 1223–1256. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2015-0183
10.
Lau, K. W., & Lee, P. Y. (2019). Shopping in virtual reality : a study on consumers’ shopping experience in a stereoscopic virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 23(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10055-018-0362-3
11.
Pantano, E., Rese, A., & Baier, D. (2017). Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2017.05.011
12.
Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., & Rana, N. P. (2025). Unveiling virtual interactive marketplaces: Shopping motivations in the Metaverse through the lens of uses and gratifications theory. Journal of Business Research, 190, 115219. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2025.115219
13.
Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. K. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTMKT.2016.075690
14.
Rese, A., Schreiber, S., & Baier, D. (2014). Technology acceptance modeling of augmented reality at the point of sale: Can surveys be replaced by an analysis of online reviews? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(5), 869–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2014.02.011
15.
Salisbury, W. D., Pearson, R. A., Pearson, A. W., & Miller, D. W. (2001). Perceived security and World Wide Web purchase intention. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(4), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570110390071
16.
Sekhavat, Y. A., & Zarei, H. (2018). Sense of Immersion in Computer Games Using Single and Stereoscopic Augmented Reality. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1340229
17.
Su, K. W., Chen, S. C., Lin, P. H., & Hsieh, C. I. (2019). Evaluating the user interface and experience of VR in the electronic commerce environment: a hybrid approach. Virtual Reality, 24(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10055-019-00394-W
18.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
19.
Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance. 16(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.1050.0042