Pathways to SME development in Hue City’s trade and service sectors: A configurational fsQCA approach

Tóm tắt

This study applies fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to examine how internal capabilities and government support combine to foster SME development in the service and trade sectors of Hue City, Vietnam. Drawing on the Resource-Based View (RBV) and the Technology - Organization - Environment (TOE) framework, the study analyzes survey data from 158 SMEs. The findings identify two distinct configurational pathways associated with high performance. Government support emerges as a necessary condition, while access to finance and technological capability serve as complementary factors. Managerial capability and human capital, by contrast, function as substitutable resources across the identified configurations. Overall, the results highlight the asymmetric and configurational nature of SME performance, demonstrating that high performance can arise from different combinations of internal capabilities and external support.

Từ khóa
configurational approach fsQCA Resource-Based View SME development TOE framework

Tài liệu tham khảo

1.
Nguyen Thi Lan Anh (2021). Factors affecting operating performance in financial aspects of businesses in Nam Dinh Province. Tạp chí Khoa học & Đào tạo Ngân hàng, 232, 46-58.
2.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
3.
Bouazza, A. B., Ardjouman, D., Abada, O., et al. (2015). Establishing the Factors Affecting the Growth of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Algeria. American International Journal of Social Science, 4(2), 101-115.
4.
Dahinine, B., Chouayb, L. & Bensahel, W. (2023). Knowledge management and firm performance in Algerian F&B SMEs: The role of trust as a moderating variable. Sustainability, 15(13), 10074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310074
5.
Nguyen Thi Phuc Doang & Nguyen Van Dai (2023). Factors affecting sustainable development of SMEs in Vietnam. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh - Kinh tế và Quản trị Kinh doanh, 18(2), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.18.2.2181.2023.
6.
Do Tuan Vu (2023). Factors affecting the small and medium-sized enterprises (SEMS) performance in Thanh Hoa province. Tạp chí Kinh tế và Phát triển, 310, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.33301/JED.VI.1141
7.
Fadahunsi, A. (2012). The growth of small businesses: Towards a research agenda. In A. Fadahunsi (Ed.), Small business and entrepreneurship development. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/37854
8.
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
9.
Hair, J. F., et al. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
10.
Dang Thi Mai Huong, Vu Viet Ninh, Nguyen Dinh Hoan, Dinh Quang Toan, Nguyen Thi Hong Van & Dang Thi Lan (2022). Factors affecting SMEs’ development in Vietnam. Accounting, 8(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.7.007
11.
Kusa, R., Duda, J., Suder, M., et al. (2021). Explaining SME performance with fsQCA: The role of entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneur motivation, and opportunity perception. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2021.06.001
12.
Nguyen Van Phuong, Huynh Thi Ngoc Hien, Lam Nguyen Hai Long, Le Bao Toan & Nguyen Xuan Hong Nghi (2021). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on SMEs’ performance: The mediating effects of organizational factors. Heliyon, 7(6), e07326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07326
13.
Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
14.
Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., Jiang, Y., et al. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920-936. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377.
15.
Pham Thanh Van, Nguyen Thanh Luan, Nguyen Thi Lai & Phan Thi Thu (2021). The contribution of small and medium-sized enterprises in the economic growth of the Southeast Region of Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(9), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO9.0155
16.
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
17.
Schneider, C. Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244
18.
Srimulyani, V. A., Hermanto, Y. B., Rustiyaningsih, S., et al. (2023). Internal factors of entrepreneurial and business performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in East Java, Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(11), e21637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21637
19.
Thua Thien Hue Provincial People’s Committee. (2021). The Five-Year Socio-Economic Development Plan for the 2021-2025 Period. Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam.
20.
Tornatzky, L. G. and Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
21.
Venkatraman, N., Ramanujam, V. (1987). Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of Management, 13(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638701300109
22.
Wiklund, J., Patzelt, H. & Shepherd, D.A. (2009). Building an integrative model of small business growth. Small Business Economics, 32(4), 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9084-8
23.
Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
24.
Zhang, Y., Idris, S. B., Lily, J. B., et al. (2024). Research on the influencing factors of DT of SMEs from TOE perspective. Global Business and Finance Review, 29(3), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2024.29.3.108