Identifying the factors affecting corporate income tax compliance by using the economic deterrence model

Abstract

This study is to find and synthesize the factors affecting corporate income tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises. By using the economic deterrence model, this study finds out that the factors affecting corporate income tax compliance are (i) the detection ability of the taxation authorities; (ii) the tax rate; (iii) the audit probability; (iv) the penalties; (v) the complexity of tax policy; (vii) the tax spirit; and (viii) the tax support, propaganda and education. Although the factors affecting tax compliance of Vietnamese enterprises are identified, it is necessary to conduct further quantitative studies to determine the level of impact of these factors.
Keywords
corporate income tax economic deterrence model taxation authority

References

1.
Allingham, M. G., and Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338.
2.
Alm, J. (2019). What Motivates Tax Compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 353-388.
3.
Alm, J., & McKee, M. (2006). Audit certainty, audit productivity and taxpayer compliance. National Tax Journal, 59(4), 801-816.
4.
Alm, J., Jackson, B., & McKee, M. (1992a). Institutional uncertainty and taxpayer compliance. American Economic Review, 82 (4), 1018-1027.
5.
Alm, J., Kirchler, E., Muehlbacher, S. (2012).Combining Psychology and Economics in the Analysis of Compliance: From Enforcement to Cooperation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 42(2), 133-151.
6.
Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818-819.
7.
Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818-819.
8.
Anyaduba, J.O., & Modugu, K.P. (2013). Tax audit and tax compliance in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 3(8), 227-239.
9.
Chau, G., & Leung, P. (2009). A critical review of Fischer tax compliance model: A research synthesis. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 1(2), 34-40.
10.
Dubin, J.A., Graetz, M.J., & Wilde, L.L. (1990). The effect of audit rates on federal income tax filings and collections, 1977-1986. National Tax Journal, 43(4), 395-409.
11.
Fischer, C.M., Wartick, M., & Mark, M. (1992). Detection probability and taxpayer compliance: A review of the literature. J. Acc. Lit. 11(1), 1-46.
12.
Friedland, N., Maital, S., & Rutenberg, A. (1978). A simulation study ofincome tax evasion. J. Public Econ. 10, 107-116.
13.
Grasmick, H., & Scott, W.J. (1982). Tax evasion and mechanisms of social control: A comparison with grand and petty theft. J Econ. Psychol., 2(3), 213-230.
14.
Gzel, S. A., Ưzerb, G., Ưzcan, M., (2019).The Effect of the Variables of Tax Justice Perception and Trust in Government on Tax Compliance: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 78(2019), 80-86.
15.
Hai, D. O. T., & See, L. M. (2011). Behavioral Intention of Tax Non Compliance among Sole-Proprietors in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(6), 142- 152.
16.
Jackson, B.R., & Jaouen, P.R. (1989). Influencing taxpayer compliance through sanction threat or appeals to conscience. Adv. Taxation, 2(1), 131-147.
17.
James, S., and Alley, C. (2002). Tax Compliance, Self-Assessment and Tax Administration. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 2(2), 27-42.
18.
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., and Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210-225.
19.
Liebman, J.B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). Scheduling. Mimeo: Harvard University.
20.
Palil, M.R. & Mustapha, A.F. (2011) Tax audit and tax compliance in Asia: A case study of Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 24(1), 7-32.
21.
Pommerehne, W.W., Hart, A., & Frey, B.S. (1994).Tax morale, tax evasion and the choice of policy instruments in different political systems. Supplement toPublic Finance, 49, 52-69.
22.
Scotchmer, S., &S lemrod, J. (1989). Randomness in tax enforcement. J. Econ., 38(1), 17-32.
23.
Shanmugam, S. (2003). Managing self-assessment - An appraisal. Tax Nasional, 1st Quarter, 30-32.
24.
Smith, S. (1992). Taxation and the Environment: A Survey. Fiscal Studies, 15(2), 19-43.
25.
Spicer, M.W., & Becker, L.M. (1980). Fiscal inequity and tax evasion: An experimental approach. National Tax Journal, 33(2), 171-175.
26.
Spicer, M.W., & Lundstedt, S.B. (1976). Understanding tax evasion. Public Finance, 31(2), 295-305.
27.
Tittle, C. (1980). Sanctions and social deviance: The question of deterrence. New York: Praeger.
28.
Virmani, A. (1989). Indirect tax evasion and production efficiency. Journal of Public Economics, 39(4), 223-237.
29.
Witte, A.D., & Woodbury, D.F. (1985). The effect of tax laws and tax administration on tax compliance: The case of the U.S. individual income tax. Nat. Tax J., 38(1), 1-13.